When is it lawful to stand your ground in Colorado? The Colorado Supreme Court tackled that question in People v. Idrogo, 818 P.2d 752 (Colo. 1991), a landmark case that affirmed a citizen’s right to self-defense without the obligation to retreat—if certain conditions are met.
As more concealed carry permit holders and security professionals navigate the legal realities of defensive force, this case remains critical to understanding Colorado’s approach to self-defense law.
Background of the Case
Anthony Idrogo found himself in a confrontation he never wanted. On the night of September 6, 1985, Idrogo was walking home near a liquor store in Colorado Springs when a man named William Archuleta—highly intoxicated and demanding marijuana—began following him. Idrogo declined the request, tried to walk away, and told Archuleta to stop.
But Archuleta kept following, reportedly aggressive and confrontational. Eventually, a physical struggle broke out, and Idrogo drew a handgun and fired, fatally shooting Archuleta.
He was charged and convicted of reckless manslaughter and a crime of violence, later found to be a habitual criminal. At trial, Idrogo asked the judge to instruct the jury that he had no legal duty to retreat before using force in self-defense.
The court refused.
What the Supreme Court Ruled
The Colorado Supreme Court overturned the conviction—not because Idrogo’s use of force was definitely lawful, but because the jury was never properly instructed on Colorado’s self-defense laws, specifically the “no duty to retreat” provision.
Colorado law allows individuals to use deadly force if:
- They are not the initial aggressor
- They reasonably believe deadly force is necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm
Importantly, they are not legally required to retreat, even if retreat might have been possible.
The Supreme Court held that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on this essential principle. While the specific instruction Idrogo proposed had technical issues, he was still entitled to a correct version explaining that he did not have to run away if he reasonably believed he was in danger.
Why This Case Matters Today
People v. Idrogo reinforces the legal right to stand your ground in Colorado, as long as you’re acting lawfully and not provoking the incident. This is especially important for:
- Concealed handgun permit (CHP) holders
- Security guards and professionals
- Homeowners and private citizens defending themselves in public spaces
It also serves as a reminder that jury instructions can make or break a trial, particularly when self-defense is on the line. If a jury doesn’t understand the law, they can’t fairly evaluate a self-defense claim.
Key Takeaways
- Colorado does not impose a duty to retreat before using lawful self-defense
- If you’re not the aggressor and you reasonably believe you’re in danger, you can act—even if you could technically escape
- Proper legal instructions in court are essential in self-defense cases
Final Thoughts
People v. Idrogo should be required reading for anyone who carries a firearm or works in private security. It’s a powerful case that upholds the legal protections given to defenders who act lawfully under pressure—and serves as a cautionary tale of what can happen when juries are misinformed about the law.
Want to make sure you understand when and how to legally use force in Colorado?
👉 Sign up for one of our concealed carry or use-of-force training courses today
Legal Disclaimer:
This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you are facing criminal charges or have questions about the lawful use of force, consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. Self-defense laws can vary and are subject to change. Always seek professional legal guidance when interpreting or applying the law.
