firearms Archives

The Legal Risks of Carrying a Firearm Under the Influence in Colorado

In Colorado, the intersection of firearms and intoxication is addressed under stringent legal statutes, particularly highlighted in the Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) 18-12-106. This regulation specifies the boundaries and consequences regarding the handling of firearms when under the influence of intoxicating substances. Understanding these laws is crucial for all firearm owners in the state to ensure they adhere to legal standards and maintain safety.

Understanding CRS 18-12-106(1)(d)

Under CRS 18-12-106(1)(d), it is stated that an individual commits a class 1 misdemeanor if they have a firearm in their possession while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or controlled substances as defined in CRS 18-18-102(5). This section of the statute makes it clear that being under the influence of alcohol or drugs while possessing a firearm is not only irresponsible but also illegal.

The law specifies that neither a standard concealed handgun permit issued under CRS 18-12-105.1 nor a temporary emergency permit serves as a defense against a violation of this provision. This detail underscores the seriousness with which Colorado law treats the mix of firearms and intoxicants. The state aims to prevent impaired judgment, which is significantly risky in situations involving potentially lethal weapons.

The Consequences

Violating CRS 18-12-106(1)(d) results in a class 1 misdemeanor charge, which is a substantial penalty. Such charges can result in significant fines and possible jail time, not to mention a lasting impact on one’s legal record and future, including potential difficulties in employment, housing, and educational opportunities.

Enforcement Practices and Legal Standards

Alcohol

For alcohol, a common benchmark used by law enforcement is the standard for driving under the influence (DUI). In most states, including Colorado, the legal blood alcohol content (BAC) limit for driving is 0.08%. However, when it comes to firearms, officers may use their judgment to assess whether a person’s ability to handle a firearm safely is impaired, which can occur at BAC levels lower than 0.08%.

Marijuana

Marijuana, while legal for recreational use in Colorado, still presents legal challenges under federal law, especially in the context of firearm possession. For assessing impairment, law enforcement might loosely apply standards similar to those used for driving. However, because THC (the active ingredient in marijuana) metabolizes differently than alcohol and can remain detectable in the body longer, the assessment is more subjective and based on observed impairment rather than a specific THC level.

Prescription Drugs

For prescription drugs, the approach is similar to that for alcohol and marijuana. The key factor is whether the individual is impaired to a degree that they cannot safely handle a firearm. As with DUI laws, if a person is considered too impaired to drive due to prescription medications, they are likely too impaired to safely possess a firearm. This often involves an officer’s assessment of physical and cognitive signs of impairment.

Other Controlled Substances

For illegal drugs such as cocaine, fentanyl, and others, there is typically a zero-tolerance approach. Possession of a firearm while under the influence of these substances can lead to severe legal consequences, regardless of the amount consumed or the level of impairment. The presence of these substances in one’s system while in possession of a firearm is likely to be sufficient for a charge under CRS 18-12-106(1)(d).

Legal Implications

It’s important to remember that beyond state laws, federal regulations under the Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibit drug users and addicts from purchasing or possessing firearms and ammunition, regardless of state laws regarding drug legality. This includes marijuana, despite its legal status in many states.

Practical Advice for Firearm Owners

For responsible gun owners, the message is straightforward:

Avoid mixing alcohol or drugs with firearm handling: Always store firearms securely and do not access them while under the influence of any intoxicating substances.
Educate yourself and others: Understanding the specifics of local firearm laws can be the difference between responsible ownership and facing serious legal consequences.
Plan ahead: If you know you will be consuming alcohol or controlled substances, ensure that your firearms are safely stored and inaccessible.

Conclusion

Colorado’s laws on carrying a firearm while under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances are designed to protect the community and promote responsible firearm handling. Adherence to these laws is not only a legal obligation but a moral one to ensure the safety of all. By staying informed and vigilant, gun owners can contribute to a safer environment for everyone.

Gear and Equipment, Reviews

Recommendations Guide: Armed Security Guard Equipment

April 9, 2024April 27, 2025 Mark Schneider

Top Handgun Picks for Security Guards: The Glock Advantage

For security guards, the right gear is non-negotiable, especially when it comes to handguns. Glock’s reputation for reliability, safety, and affordability makes its models stand out. Among the top picks are the Glock 17, 19, and 45, and here’s why they’re favored:

Affordability: Glocks offer great value, ensuring security professionals can equip themselves without breaking the bank.
Safety: Features like the Safe Action System prevent accidental discharges, making Glocks a safe choice for high-stress environments.
Ease of Use: Designed for comfort and straightforward operation, these models are suitable for guards of all experience levels.
Versatility: Whether you need the robust Glock 17, the compact Glock 19, or the balanced Glock 45, there’s a Glock that fits every security role.
Magazines: Glocks typically come with three magazines. You will need to carry a minimum of three on you while working. One in the handgun and two back up magazines. Example: Glock 19 – One seated in the mag well of the handgun. (15 plus 1) Two back ups on your belt or vest/carrier. Fifteen rounds in each mag with a total of 46 rounds carried on you.

Magazine Compliance Across States

It’s worth noting that Glock provides 10 and 15 round magazines for models like the 17, 19, and 45, ensuring compliance with the laws of states such as Colorado, New Jersey, and California. This adaptability makes Glock an even more appealing choice for security guards, offering versatility and legality across various jurisdictions.

Affordable Glock Options for Security Guards

Security guards on a budget have a practical option: opting for a used Glock. A new Glock typically costs around $600, but a pre-owned one can be found for between $350 to $450—a significant saving.

Where to Find Them

Cabela’s is a recommended destination for those searching for a used Glock. While their used gun inventory isn’t listed online, visiting in-store can lead to finding a great deal.

Important Note On Magazines: You can NOT carry anything above the legal capacity limit in your state while on POST as a security guard. In Colorado for example, your magazine(s) must be a 10 or 15 round capacity. The City & County Of Denver Excise & Licensing made it policy that licensed guards must be in compliance with Colorado law. Denver Police might check magazines during a guard audit. If it is above 15 rounds you will receive a citation and have your magazine(s) confiscated. You also risk losing your security guard license for up to five years and having a criminal conviction on your record.

Essential Holster Recommendations for Security Guards

After extensive testing and evaluation of various options, four specific holsters stand out for their reliability and security. The Sariland ALS/SLS, BlackHawk! T3, Dara Level 2 Duty and Alien Gear Rapid Force Holsters. These holsters provide quality fitting for safely carrying your firearm and superior protection against someone unlawfully attempting to disarm you. A risk that shouldn’t be underestimated, especially considering the physical altercations security guards may find themselves in.

Why Retention Holsters?

Retention holsters offer an enhanced level of security, featuring mechanism(s) that must be sequentially engaged to release the firearm. This design significantly reduces the risk of an assailant successfully disarming a guard. In high-risk environments, the extra seconds it takes for an unauthorized person to understand and bypass these mechanisms can be critical.

A Cautionary Note

While exploring options, one particular holster has shown to be less desirable: the Blackhawk Serpa holster. Despite its popularity, it’s important to highlight its limitations, especially concerning safety. The Serpa design, which includes a single level of security, has been associated with numerous incidents where users, including law enforcement officers and civilians, have accidentally discharged their firearms during the draw. Such a risk is unacceptable in the high-stakes situations security guards often face.

Safariland Level 3: The Ultimate Holster for Security Guards

Safariland Level 3 Holster (Mark’s Choice)

The Safariland Level 3 holster is the top recommendation for armed security guards, offering unparalleled security with its three levels of retention:

The Safariland Level 3 ALS/SLS holster offers top-tier security with its Automatic Locking System (ALS) and Self Locking System (SLS), ensuring dual-layer protection against unauthorized firearm removal. It’s designed for a quick, instinctive draw, aligning with the Master Grip Principle for fast response in critical situations. Durable and built for the demands of security work, this holster represents the pinnacle of retention and reliability for professionals.

Key Features

Dual Retention: ALS and SLS systems for enhanced security.
Quick Draw: Optimized for fast, natural access to the firearm.
Durability: Robust construction for enduring performance.
High-Level Security: Level 3 classification for maximum protection.

Where to Purchase the Safariland Level 3 Holster

The Safariland Level 3 holster is available both new and used across a variety of platforms, ensuring that security guards can find the best deal to suit their budget. You can find this holster on Amazon, eBay, directly from Safariland, and at police supply stores. eBay, in particular, is highlighted as a great place to find both new and used holsters at competitive prices. Many have found exceptional deals there, with prices ranging from $70 to $225, making it a go-to source for securing this essential piece of gear without overspending.

BlackHawk T-Series Holster: Combining Security with Quick Access

The T-Series holster emerges as an excellent choice for security guards seeking a balance between rapid accessibility and unwavering security. This holster is distinguished by its thumb-activated retention system, which aligns with the Master Grip Principle, ensuring that drawing under pressure is intuitive and swift.

Key Features:

Thumb-Activated Retention: Adheres to the Master Grip Principle for a fast and natural draw.
Smooth Internal Material: Low friction for a seamless draw and holstering experience, with sound-dampening lining for stealthy operations.
Durable and Sleek: Reinforced outer polymer and hydrophobic lining ensure performance in any condition, designed for minimal bulk.
Enhanced Security: Level 3 configuration includes a retention strap across the back of the slide for additional safety.
Accessory Compatible: Comes with a Jacket Slot Belt Loop, with the option to purchase a Quick Dual Release (QDR) Belt Loop and 2-Slot Belt Loop separately.

Purchasing Options and Price Range

Available on platforms like Amazon, eBay, and at police supply stores, the T-Series offers flexibility in purchasing options. eBay is particularly recommended for finding both new and used holsters at competitive prices. The price range for this holster spans from $50 to $175. Notably, finding a brand new T-Series L3D for $60 on eBay has been reported, highlighting the platform’s potential for great deals.

Dara Level 2 Holster: Reliable Retention for Armed Security, Including Walther and Canik Models

The Dara Level 2 holster is an excellent choice for armed security guards seeking reliable retention and quick access to their firearm. It’s designed with a single retention mechanism, offering great security while prioritizing efficiency in high-pressure environments. What sets Dara apart is their ability to produce holsters for hard-to-find models like Walther, CZ, FNH and Canik pistols, ensuring that security professionals with these brands are not left without a high-quality retention option.

Key Features

Dual Level Retention: Features a single, secure retention mechanism, balancing security with speed.
Quick Draw: Designed for intuitive, fast access, perfect for professionals who need a rapid response.
Durability: Built with high-quality materials to withstand the rigors of daily security work.
Custom Fit for Hard-to-Find Models: Dara specializes in holsters for pistols like Walther and Canik, making it a go-to for those needing retention options for less common firearms.
Affordability: Offers dependable security without the higher price tag of more complex systems.

Where to Purchase the Dara Level 2 Holster

The Dara Level 2 holster can be found on platforms such as the Dara website, Amazon, and tactical gear retailers. Prices typically range from $135 to $200, depending on the model and retailer. For budget-conscious security guards, eBay offers both new and used Dara holsters, allowing for quality gear at more accessible costs. Dara’s ability to cater to Walther, CZ, FNH and Canik pistol owners makes it a top choice for those in need of specialized retention holsters.

Alien Gear Rapid Duty Holster: Versatile and Secure Retention for Duty Use

The Alien Gear Rapid Duty Holster is an innovative choice for armed security professionals who demand both speed and security. Designed for quick access without compromising retention, the Rapid Duty Holster offers retention to suit quick accessibility and security needs. Its modular design allows for adaptability across various platforms, making it one of the most versatile holsters available for duty use. With Alien Gear’s focus on user comfort and durability, this holster is perfect for long shifts and demanding environments.

Key Features

Adjustable Retention: Allows the user to customize the retention level for secure carry and faster draws.
Quick Access: Engineered for a smooth, instinctive draw when speed matters most.
Modular Design: Compatible with multiple carry platforms (paddle, belt, or MOLLE) for flexible use in various security roles.
Durability and Comfort: Made with durable materials to withstand daily use while maintaining comfort for extended wear.
Secure Fit for Multiple Firearms: Designed to accommodate a variety of firearm models, ensuring a perfect fit for most duty weapons.

Where to Purchase the Alien Gear Rapid Duty Holster

The Alien Gear Rapid Duty Holster is available directly from the Alien Gear website, as well as major retailers like Amazon and tactical supply stores. Prices generally range from $135 to $200, depending on customization options and the specific model. The holster’s ability to adjust retention and fit various firearms makes it an ideal option for professionals seeking versatile security gear.

Top Duty Belt Recommendation: The 5.11 Sierra Bravo

The 5.11 Sierra Bravo Duty Belt is a standout choice for security guards, offering durability and affordability at around $65. This belt package includes an inner belt, outer belt, and belt keepers, designed to endure years of heavy use without compromise. Its high-quality construction ensures reliability for daily duties.

Where to Buy

Available on the 5.11 website, Amazon, eBay, and local law enforcement supply stores, the Sierra Bravo is accessible to security professionals everywhere, making it an ideal option for those seeking a dependable duty belt that balances cost with performance.

Essential Security Gear: The Magazine Holder

An often-overlooked yet vital component of a security guard’s gear is the magazine holder. Carrying sufficient ammunition is not just a contractual requirement for many security jobs but a practical necessity in critical situations. The consensus among professionals is clear: having a total of 3 magazines on hand is essential, ensuring preparedness for any scenario.

Recommended Brands and Preferences

For those in the market for a magazine holder, brands like Bianchi, Safariland, 5.11, Blackhawk, Alien Gear, Gould & Goodrich, Esstac and Uncle Mike’s come highly recommended. These brands offer products that balance quality with affordability, with prices ranging from $18 to $40 for a durable mag pouch. The choice between an open-top design and other styles is a personal preference, but the ease of access with open-top models is something many security professionals appreciate.

Notable Options

Safariland deserves a special mention for their triple magazine pouch, an ideal option for guards looking to carry an extra backup magazine. This option underscores the importance of being well-equipped for any eventuality, offering peace of mind that you’re prepared for even the most demanding situations.

Where to Buy

When it comes to purchasing magazine holders a lot of gear can be found on platforms like eBay and Amazon, which offer a wide selection from reputable brands. Additionally, local police supply stores often stock a range of magazine. For those who prefer to shop online, there’s no shortage of specialized websites offering an array of magazine holders, ensuring you can find exactly what you need with convenience and ease.

Top Pepper Spray Recommendation: Sabre 3.3 oz Pepper Foam

For security guards seeking effective non-lethal defense options, the Sabre 3.3 oz Pepper Foam stands out, especially recommended for its versatility in both indoor and outdoor settings. The choice of foam over spray is critical due to its reduced risk of contamination, making it safer for use in confined spaces.

Key Specs:

Maximum Strength: Features 10% Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) with 1.33% Major Capsaicinoids, marking it as the strongest single ingredient pepper spray available.
Sabre RED Formula: Known for its potency and reliability.
UV Dye: Aids in suspect identification, adding an extra layer of utility in post-incident investigations.

The Sabre 3.3 oz Pepper Foam’s design and formulation make it an excellent tool for security personnel, providing a powerful yet controlled option for neutralizing threats while minimizing risks to bystanders and the environment.

The Sabre 3.3 oz Pepper Foam can be conveniently purchased on popular online platforms such as Amazon or eBay. With a price tag of approximately $27 per can, it offers security guards a cost-effective solution for non-lethal defense needs. This accessibility ensures that guards can easily obtain this highly recommended pepper foam for their protection arsenal.

Essential Pepper Spray Pouch Recommendations

For security guards, a reliable pepper spray holder is indispensable. Trusted brands like Safariland, Bianchi, and Uncle Mike’s offer quality options ensuring secure and accessible storage. With prices ranging from $15 to $40, guards can find a suitable holder that fits their budget while providing essential functionality and durability.

Price Range: $15 to $40

Pepper spray holders from reputable brands typically range in price from $15 to $40. This ensures guards can find a suitable holder that fits their budget while offering the necessary durability and functionality for carrying pepper spray securely on duty.

Essential Defense Tool: The Baton

For security professionals seeking reliability without breaking the bank, the 21 inch Smith & Wesson Heat Treated Baton is the top choice. Its superior construction and affordable price point set it apart in the market. With durability built-in and a price tag that won’t disappoint, it’s the ideal investment for any security team. The baton already comes with a carrier, which offers great value.

Key Specs:

Blade Length: 14.4 inches
Overall Length: 21 inches
Weight: 1 pound
Blade Material: 4130 Seamless Alloy Steel Tubing
Handle Material: Thermoplastic Rubber
Tensile Strength: 6638.78 lbf (3011.3 kgf)
Bending Strength: 4055.84 lbf (1839.7 kgf)
Additional Features:
Textured and raised rubber handle
Includes black 1680 denier outer shell belt sheath

Priced at $45 to $80, the Smith & Wesson Heat Treated Baton is readily available for purchase on their official website, as well as through reputable online retailers like Cabela’s, eBay, and various other online retail platforms. This accessibility ensures that security professionals can easily acquire this top-quality baton from trusted sources, making it a convenient and reliable choice for their needs.

Essential Restraints: Handcuffs

When it comes to handcuffs, my unequivocal recommendation goes to Smith & Wesson. Renowned for their exceptional quality and unbeatable price, Smith & Wesson handcuffs, particularly the Model 100, have remained a staple in the industry for years. Constructed from nickel-plated carbon steel, these handcuffs offer both strength and corrosion resistance, ensuring longevity even in the most demanding situations.

Key Specs:

Material: Nickel-plated carbon steel
Finish: Satin nickel (non-reflective)
Wrist Opening: 2.04 inches
Locking Positions: 22
First Notch Inside Perimeter: 8.40 inches
Last Notch Inside Perimeter: 5.80 inches
Tightest Inside Width: 1.80 inches
Distance Between Cuffs: 2.00 inches
Maximum Overall Length: 8.98 inches
Weight: 10 ounces
Double Locking Mechanism: Slot lock design for added security
Included: Two handcuff keys, Smith & Wesson’s lifetime warranty, and instructions
Part Number: 350103

Price range varies from $25 to $30 and you can find them on eBay, Amazon, local police supply stores, and other online retailers. Most security guards need just one pair but some carry two.

Carrying Your Handcuffs: Handcuff Pouches

In the realm of handcuff pouches, several reputable brands stand out for their quality and functionality. Brands like Bianchi, Safariland, and Uncle Mike’s offer a range of options to suit different preferences and needs. The cost of these handcuff pouches typically ranges from $15 to $40, making them accessible to security professionals on various budgets. You can easily purchase them online through platforms like Amazon and eBay, or visit your local police supply store for a hands-on shopping experience. With options available for every style and budget, these handcuff pouches ensure that your handcuffs are securely and conveniently stored while on duty.

Defending Yourself Against Deadly Force: Body Armor

In the world of armed security, having the right gear isn’t just important; it’s essential. That’s why I’m pointing you towards what I believe is the best body armor out there: SafeLife Defense’s Enhanced Level IIIA Body Armor.

Why SafeLife Defense?

Quality, selection, affordability. SafeLife stands out for these reasons. Their latest armor uses top-notch materials like Dyneema, Honeywell, and SAATI, offering unmatched protection against common threats, all while being incredibly comfortable for all-day wear.

Key Specs:

Superior Protection: Resistant to bullets, strikes, and slashes.
Increased Coverage: 15% more side protection.
Concealable and Comfortable: Engineered for discreet wear and long hours on duty.
Water-Resistant and Durable: Built to last in any conditions.
Top-Rated for Comfort: Features a cooling mesh liner and adjustable fit for unparalleled comfort.

My Takeaway

For armed security guards, choosing SafeLife’s Level IIIA Body Armor means not just investing in top-tier protection, but also in your comfort and mobility on the job. It’s my top recommendation for anyone in the security field. In my view, SafeLife isn’t just a choice; it’s the best investment for your safety. The Price For a Vest starts at $650 and you can purchase it on SafeLifes Website.

ACE Link and 5.11 Carriers.

The AceLink and 5.11 body armor carriers are excellent choices for security guards seeking affordable and reliable exterior protection. Both carriers are designed with functionality and durability in mind, offering essential features such as adjustable straps for a secure fit, ample MOLLE webbing for customization, and high-quality materials that ensure longevity. The AceLink carrier is known for its lightweight yet robust design, while the 5.11 carrier provides enhanced comfort with its breathable construction. These carriers strike a balance between affordability and performance, making them ideal for security professionals who require dependable body armor in their line of duty. The 5.11 carrier runs around $150 to $220 dollars. The ACE Link runs $100 to $200 dollars.

NOTE: You need to purchase armor plates or panels for these carriers! They do not come with any ballistic protection!

Carrier Body Armor Inserts

Down Range body armor is renowned for its exceptional reliability and high level of protection, making it a top choice for those in demanding security roles. Engineered with advanced ballistic materials, Down Range armor offers comprehensive coverage against a variety of threats, ensuring maximum safety in critical situations. Its ergonomic design enhances mobility and comfort, allowing wearers to perform effectively without compromising protection. Rigorous testing and quality control measures underscore the armor’s dependability, providing users with confidence in its performance. Whether in law enforcement or private security, Down Range body armor delivers robust defense and reliability when it matters most. The two 10 x 12 3A panels required will run about $160 dollars. Level 3A will stop up to .44 magnum rounds. Here is a link to Down Range Industries.

Down Range Industries Level 3A Soft Plates

Essential Illumination: Flashlights

The Streamlight 88062 2L-X 500 Lumen Flashlight is the top recommendation for security guards, thanks to its exceptional blend of durability, performance, and practical features. Here’s a quick overview:

Key Specs:

High Brightness: 500 lumens, with a light path distance of 165 meters, ideal for navigation and deterrence.
Durability: Made from aluminum, ensuring it can withstand the rigors of night patrols.
Waterproof: Capable of performing in adverse weather conditions.
Compact and Lightweight: Easy to carry without compromising on power, with dimensions of 5.14″D x 0.94″W x 1.06″H and weighing just 0.634 ounces.
Versatile Power Source: Runs on 2 CR123A batteries (included), with the option for rechargeable or non-rechargeable use.
Water Resistance Level: Waterproof
Cost-Effective: Priced at approximately $55, it’s an affordable option for a high-quality tool.

Available on Amazon, eBay, Cabela’s, and at local gun shops among other retailers, the Streamlight 88062 offers security professionals an indispensable tool that balances performance with durability, ensuring they’re always prepared, no matter what the night holds.

Essential Hand Protection: Gloves

HexArmor Gloves emerge as the superior choice, striking an ideal balance between functionality, protection, and cost. Specifically designed to be stab and needle-resistant, these gloves are essential for those in the security sector who face potential threats on a daily basis. Beyond their protective capabilities, HexArmor Gloves are crafted with convenience and durability in mind:

Key Specs:

Touchscreen-Compatible Fingertips: Stay connected without the need to remove your gloves.
Synthetic Leather Palm: Ensures a firm grip in dry conditions.
Secure and Durable Fit: Features a SlipFit cuff with hook and loop closure, alongside a reinforced index finger and thumb saddle for extended use.
Soft Brow Cloth: Located on the back of the thumb for easy sweat management.
Easy Care: Gloves can be laundered by hand or on a gentle cycle and are designed to hang dry, ensuring they’re ready for your next shift without the risk of shrinking or damage.

Priced at just $19, HexArmor Gloves make economic sense for security personnel. This affordability allows for purchasing multiple pairs, making it easy to replace them as needed without breaking the bank. Find them on Amazon and upgrade your security gear with gloves that don’t compromise on protection or functionality.

Essential Footwear: Shoes and/or Boots

Selecting the right footwear is a pivotal decision for security guards, who often spend long hours on their feet, navigating through varying environments. The ideal choice merges functionality with comfort, ensuring that security personnel are ready for anything that comes their way. Here are some key considerations for security guard footwear:

Larnmern Boots (Mark’s Choice for affordability, durability & comfort))

Key Specs:

Color: Footwear should be all black to align with standard security uniforms and maintain a professional appearance.
Waterproofing: For duties in wet conditions, waterproof boots or shoes are essential to keep feet dry and comfortable.
Slip Resistance: Slip-resistant soles are a must for maintaining stability and safety in all conditions.
Comfort: Above all, footwear should provide support and comfort for long periods of standing or walking.

Brands like Larnmern, 5.11, Nike, Reebok, Original Swat, Under Armour, and Galls are known for their quality and reliability in producing footwear that meets the demanding needs of security work. These brands offer options that cater to different preferences and requirements, from lightweight shoes for agility to robust boots for enhanced protection.

Prices for security guard footwear vary, ranging from $40 to $225, reflecting differences in quality, build, and features. Investing in higher-quality footwear can result in better comfort and durability, ultimately proving more economical in the long run due to less frequent replacements.

You can find a wide selection of suitable footwear online through retailers like Amazon, eBay, the 5.11 store, Galls, or at local police supply stores. When choosing footwear, consider the specific demands of your security duties to select the best option that combines comfort, durability, and protection.

Throughout this article, we’ve explored a meticulously curated selection of essential gear for armed security professionals, ranging from my top handgun selection to holsters, duty belts, magazine holders, pepper spray and its holder, batons, handcuffs, flashlights, gloves, boots and, critically, body armor. Each piece of equipment has been chosen based on a blend of reliability, functionality, and value, ensuring that you are not just equipped but optimally prepared for the demands of the job.

The total cost of fully outfitting oneself with this high-quality gear is around $1700—a significant investment, but one that provides immeasurable value in terms of safety, efficiency, and peace of mind. Remember, in a profession where the stakes are high and the margins for error are slim, the quality of your gear can make all the difference. Investing in the best is not just a matter of professional preparedness; it’s a commitment to your safety and the safety of those you are sworn to protect.

Fair Use Disclaimer for Photographic Content

All photographs and images displayed or referenced on this platform are utilized in accordance with the principles of “Fair Use.” This encompasses a range of purposes including, but not limited to, educational objectives, critical commentary, and scholarly analysis. Our intent is to engage in respectful utilization of visual content, ensuring that we acknowledge copyright laws and the rights of original content creators. We firmly believe in fostering an environment that supports learning, critical discussion, and an appreciation for photography and visual arts. In doing so, we aim to adhere to legal standards and ethical practices concerning the use of copyrighted materials.

Concealed Carry, Home Defense, Legal & Law

Can You Use A Firearm To Stop Assault In Colorado?

April 6, 2024April 27, 2025 Mark Schneider

Navigating Self-Defense Laws in Colorado: Insights for CCW Holders and Law-Abiding Gun Owners

In Colorado, the right to self-defense, including the use of firearms by Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) holders and other law-abiding gun owners, is outlined with precision within the state’s legal framework. Section 18-1-704 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, which discusses the use of physical force in defense of a person, serves as a critical guide for understanding when such force, particularly deadly physical force, may be justifiably used in self-defense situations, such as in the event of a first-degree assault. This article aims to shed light on these provisions, offering clarity to both CCW holders and law-abiding gun owners on their rights and responsibilities in self-defense scenarios.

Understanding the Provisions of Section 18-1-704

Section 18-1-704, while primarily concerned with the use of physical force, has profound implications for the use of firearms in self-defense. It delineates the conditions under which physical and deadly physical force can be legally employed by an individual to protect themselves or another person from perceived imminent harm.

General Right to Self-Defense: The statute acknowledges the right to use physical force in self-defense or to defend a third party when there is a reasonable belief of imminent unlawful physical force by an aggressor. The force employed must correspond to what the defender reasonably believes is necessary for protection.
Reasonable Force: The decision to use deadly physical force should be grounded in the belief that no lesser means of force could effectively neutralize the threat, particularly in scenarios where serious crimes are being committed.
Use of Deadly Physical Force: The law imposes stricter criteria for using deadly physical force, permitting it only when the defender reasonably believes that lesser force would be inadequate and:

There is an imminent danger of death or great bodily harm to oneself or another person;
The aggressor is engaging or appears about to engage in a serious crime, such as burglary, kidnapping, robbery, sexual assault, or assault, under defined sections of the law.

Restrictions on the Use of Physical Force: The statute outlines scenarios where the use of physical force is unjustifiable, including when the defender provokes the aggressor, is the initial aggressor, engages in consensual combat, or acts based on discriminatory motives related to the victim’s gender identity or sexual orientation.

What is First Degree Assault In Colorado?

First-degree assault, as defined by Colorado law (Section 18-3-202), is a severe offense that encompasses several specific acts of violence, each with the potential to result in serious legal consequences. This legal definition outlines the circumstances under which an individual’s actions are considered assault in the first degree, highlighting the seriousness with which the law views these offenses. Below, we break down the key components of this statute for clearer understanding:

Serious Bodily Injury with a Deadly Weapon: This occurs when an individual intentionally causes serious bodily harm to another person using a deadly weapon. The use of a deadly weapon amplifies the severity of the assault, indicating a deliberate intent to cause significant harm.
Intent to Disfigure or Disable: Assault of the first degree also includes actions intended to seriously and permanently disfigure another person or to destroy, amputate, or permanently disable a member or organ of their body. This provision covers acts intended to cause lasting physical damage beyond immediate harm.
Extreme Indifference to Human Life: Engaging in conduct that shows a reckless disregard for human life and creates a grave risk of death, resulting in serious bodily injury, falls under first-degree assault. This clause addresses situations where the perpetrator may not have intended to cause harm but acted with extreme negligence or indifference to the safety of others.
Threatening a Peace Officer or Emergency Worker with a Deadly Weapon: Specifically targeting peace officers, firefighters, emergency medical service providers, judges, or court officers with the intent to cause serious bodily injury and threatening them with a deadly weapon while they are performing their duties. This aspect of the law acknowledges the heightened risk and seriousness of assaulting public officials and emergency responders.
Application of Pressure to Restrict Breathing or Circulation: Intentionally applying pressure to someone’s neck or blocking their nose or mouth to restrict breathing or blood circulation, resulting in serious bodily injury, is considered first-degree assault. This provision targets acts that could lead to asphyxiation or similar life-threatening conditions.

The statute also distinguishes between assaults committed in the heat of passion and those without such mitigating circumstances, with different felony classifications and sentencing guidelines for each. Assaults committed in a sudden heat of passion, provoked by the victim in a manner that might incite an irresistible passion in a reasonable person, are treated with slightly less severity than premeditated or unprovoked assaults.

Scenario 1: The Gas Station Attempted Mugging & Assault

In the early evening hours at a city gas station, a scenario unfolds that captures the essence of a first-degree assault under Colorado law. Jane, a young woman, is returning to her car after paying inside. As she fumbles with her keys, a man, later identified as Tom, approaches her. Suddenly, without warning, he strikes Jane in the face in an attempt to snatch her purse. The force of the blow causes Jane to stagger backwards, but she instinctively clutches her purse tighter, refusing to let go.

Tom, now enraged by Jane’s resistance, escalates the violence. He forces Jane to the ground and mounts her, where he begins to deliver a series of brutal punches to her face. With each impact, Jane’s head recoils against the hard concrete, the situation growing increasingly dire. Bystanders are frozen in shock, except for one, Mike, a responsible CCW holder, who happens to be nearby.

Recognizing the grave danger Jane is in, Mike rushes over. He assesses the situation in seconds—Jane is defenseless, her assailant is relentless, and her life appears to be in immediate jeopardy. Mike shouts commands at Tom to stop the assault, hoping to de-escalate the situation without resorting to his firearm. However, Tom is undeterred. Faced with no other choice, Mike decides he must act to prevent further serious injury or possibly save Jane’s life. He draws his firearm and shoots Tom, effectively stopping the assault.

In the scenario involving Mike, Jane, and Tom at the gas station, Mike’s actions, while drastic, can be analyzed through the lens of Colorado’s self-defense laws, specifically under Section 18-1-704. The law outlines the conditions under which a person is justified in using physical force, including deadly force, to defend themselves or a third person from what they reasonably believe to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by another person. Let’s break down Mike’s actions against the criteria set forth in this statute:

1. Use of Physical Force in Defense of a Person

Reasonable Belief of Imminent Use of Unlawful Physical Force: Mike witnessed Tom assaulting Jane, a clear and present use of unlawful physical force. Tom was not only striking Jane but also causing her head to bounce off the concrete, escalating the risk of serious bodily injury or death.
Defense of a Third Person: Mike intervened to defend Jane, a third person, who was clearly unable to defend herself against Tom’s aggressive and potentially lethal actions.

2. Use of Deadly Physical Force

Belief that Lesser Degree of Force is Inadequate: Given the severity of the assault – with Jane being punched repeatedly and her head striking the concrete – Mike could reasonably believe that a lesser degree of force would not stop Tom and prevent further harm to Jane.
Imminent Danger of Being Killed or Receiving Great Bodily Injury: Jane was in imminent danger of being killed or receiving great bodily injury due to the nature of the assault. Mike’s decision to use deadly force can be seen as a response to this immediate threat.
Proportionality and Necessity: For Mike’s actions to fall within the legal justification, they must not only be necessary but also proportional to the threat. The law requires that the response (in this case, using a firearm) must not exceed what a reasonable person would consider necessary to prevent the harm.

Mike’s intervention, based on the provided scenario, appears to align with the legal requirements for the use of deadly force in defense of another person as stipulated by Section 18-1-704. He acted to prevent imminent and serious bodily harm to Jane, and his belief in the necessity of deadly force seems reasonable given the circumstances.

Scenario 2: The Drunken Bar Brawl Of Two Friends

On a Friday night, the local bar’s atmosphere spills onto the streets as patrons begin to head home. Among them are two friends, Alex and Brian, whose night out has taken a sour turn. Inside, a trivial argument over a forgotten wallet escalates, fueled by the night’s indulgences. As they step outside, heated words give way to physical confrontation. What starts as shoving quickly escalates into a fistfight.

The altercation, though serious, is an equal contest—two friends, momentarily turned adversaries, letting off steam. Neither Alex nor Brian intends real harm, and their scuffle, though aggressive, is an extension of their argument, not an attempt to seriously injure each other.

Jake, a local resident walking his dog nearby, notices the commotion. Unfamiliar with the context of the fight and seeing Alex gaining the upper hand over Brian, Jake perceives the situation through a lens of potential violence rather than a personal dispute. Without attempting to understand the dynamics at play or considering alternative actions, Jake, who is legally carrying a concealed weapon, decides to intervene directly.

Believing he is acting in defense of Brian, Jake draws his firearm and shoots Alex, who he perceives as the aggressor. The situation immediately ceases to be a drunken brawl and turns into a grave crime scene. Emergency services are called, and law enforcement quickly arrives to investigate the incident.

In this scenario, Jake’s decision to use a firearm is not justified under Colorado’s self-defense laws, nor is it a defensible action under the principles governing the use of deadly force in defense of another person:

Lack of Imminent Danger: Although Alex was winning the fight, there was no clear, imminent danger to Brian’s life that would justify the use of deadly force. The fight, while serious, did not escalate to the point where lethal intervention was necessary or reasonable.
Mutual Combat: The altercation between Alex and Brian was mutual combat, a situation where both parties willingly engage in a fight. Colorado law is clear that using physical force, especially deadly force, is not justifiable in situations of mutual combat where both parties are willing participants.
Proportionality and Reasonableness: Jake’s use of a firearm in this context is neither proportional to the threat nor reasonable given the circumstances. The principle of proportionality requires that the force used in defense be commensurate with the threat faced. In this case, a non-lethal approach, such as calling for help or attempting to de-escalate the situation, would have been more appropriate and legally justified.
Legal and Ethical Considerations: Legally, Jake’s actions could lead to severe consequences, including charges of assault or worse. Ethically, intervening in a personal dispute with lethal force, without clear justification or understanding of the situation, crosses moral boundaries and societal norms.

This scenario starkly illustrates the importance of understanding the legal and ethical implications of using deadly force. It underscores the necessity for individuals, particularly those carrying firearms, to assess situations with utmost care, considering non-lethal alternatives before intervening in disputes, especially when the dynamics are not fully understood.

Evaluating Use of Force: A Comprehensive Approach by the District Attorney

In examining any case involving the use of force, the District Attorney (DA) will meticulously evaluate the totality of the circumstances surrounding the incident as part of the discovery process. This comprehensive evaluation includes, but is not limited to, the actions of all involved parties before, during, and after the incident; the nature of the threat perceived; the level of force used in response; and the context in which the incident occurred. The DA will consider witness statements, physical evidence, the presence or absence of imminent danger, and the reasonableness of the force used, given the specific situation. This approach ensures that all factors are weighed to determine the appropriateness and legality of the actions taken. The objective is to construct a nuanced understanding of the event, allowing for a fair and just legal response that reflects the complexity of human interactions and the specifics of the law. This meticulous scrutiny is essential in upholding the principles of justice, ensuring that decisions are made based on a holistic view of each unique case.

Concluding our discussion on defending against first-degree assault within Colorado’s legal framework, it’s essential to emphasize the critical balance between self-defense and legal compliance. The nuanced nature of self-defense laws demands a thorough understanding of when and how force, particularly deadly force, can be justifiably used. The careful scrutiny by the District Attorney of each case underscores the legal system’s commitment to fairness, highlighting the importance of restraint and judicious decision-making for gun owners and CCW holders. Ultimately, the key takeaway is the necessity for individuals to respond to threats within the legal boundaries, ensuring their actions are both effective in protection and aligned with the principles of justice.

Legal Disclaimer:

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice. The scenarios discussed and the interpretations of legal statutes are meant to offer insights into the application of self-defense laws, specifically pertaining to first-degree assault, within the context of Colorado law. Laws and legal interpretations can vary significantly across different jurisdictions and may change over time. Readers are encouraged to consult with a qualified attorney for advice on specific legal issues or cases. The author of this article and the publisher disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this article. This disclaimer is intended to be a comprehensive exclusion of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect, or consequential damages; loss of data, income, or profit; loss of or damage to property; and claims of third parties.