Understanding Colorado’s Magazine Capacity Limit: An Overview of CRS 18-12-302
Colorado’s approach to gun control includes a specific focus on limiting the capacity of magazines within the state. This is outlined in Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) 18-12-302, which addresses the prohibition and penalties associated with large-capacity magazines. Let’s delve into the details of this legislation to understand its implications and exceptions.
The Prohibition and Penalties
The statute, effective from July 1, 2013, categorizes the sale, transfer, or possession of large-capacity magazines as a class 2 misdemeanor. The magazine limit is 15 rounds maximum in Colorado. This does not include a round carried in the chamber of a firearm. This forms the crux of the legislation, establishing a clear legal boundary for individuals and entities dealing with firearm magazines in Colorado. Notably, a more severe penalty—a class 6 felony—is imposed if a person possesses a large-capacity magazine while committing a felony or any crime of violence.
Definitions and Exceptions
A key aspect of CRS 18-12-302 is the definition of what constitutes a large-capacity magazine. This is crucial for enforcement and compliance. However, the statute also lays out several exceptions:
- Grandfather Clause: Individuals who owned a large-capacity magazine before July 1, 2013, and have maintained continuous possession of it are exempt from the prohibition.
- Burden of Proof: In cases where an individual is accused of violating the statute, if they claim the possession is legal under the grandfather clause, the onus is on the prosecution to disprove this assertion.
- Exemptions for Certain Entities and Individuals: The statute exempts specific entities and individuals from the prohibition, including:
- Manufacturers of large-capacity magazines in Colorado, but only for transfers to certain entities like branches of the U.S. armed forces, government departments, or out-of-state transferees who can legally possess such magazines.
- Employees of licensed gun dealers when dealing with these magazines in their official duties.
- Armed forces members and government agency employees who bear firearms as part of their official duties.
- Individuals transporting these magazines out of state on behalf of Colorado manufacturers.
Example 1: Legal Trouble Over Large-Capacity Magazine Possession
Scenario: In August 2024, John Doe, a resident of Colorado, purchases a large-capacity magazine from an online retailer based out of state. Unaware of the specific stipulations of CRS 18-12-302, John uses this magazine at a local shooting range. Another shooter at the range, familiar with Colorado’s magazine capacity laws, reports John to the authorities.
Legal Issue: Upon investigation, it’s discovered that John purchased and took possession of the large-capacity magazine after July 1, 2013. Therefore, he falls under the purview of the statute which prohibits the sale, transfer, or possession of such magazines post that date. John’s lack of awareness of the law does not exempt him from liability.
Outcome: John is charged with a class 2 misdemeanor for violating CRS 18-12-302. He faces potential penalties which may include fines, community service, or even jail time, depending on the severity of the offense as determined by the court.
Example 2: Grandfathered Possession of a Large-Capacity Magazine
Scenario: Jane Smith, also a Colorado resident, owns a large-capacity magazine that she inherited from her father. This magazine was originally purchased by her father in 2010, well before the enactment of CRS 18-12-302. Jane has kept this magazine in her possession continuously since inheriting it in 2012.
Legal Issue: In a routine check during a hunting trip, a wildlife officer inquires about Jane’s magazine for her handgun. Jane explains the origin of the magazine and its continuous possession since before July 1, 2013.
Outcome: Under CRS 18-12-302, Jane falls within the exception provided by the grandfather clause. Since she owned and has maintained continuous possession of the large-capacity magazine since a date prior to the statute’s enactment, she is not in violation of the law. The burden of proof lies with the prosecution to refute her assertion, but given her clear documentation and adherence to the law’s requirements, she faces no legal repercussions for her possession of the large-capacity magazine.
Why Can I Still Purchase High Capacity Magazines At Local Gun Stores?
Regarding the purchase of high capacity magazines in local gun stores in Colorado, despite the state’s magazine capacity law (CRS 18-12-302), revolves around the availability and sale of magazine parts kits. These kits are legally sold for the purpose of repairing or maintaining existing magazines, particularly those owned before the law’s effective date (July 1, 2013).
However, it’s important to note that assembling a new high-capacity magazine from these parts kits, or using a newly assembled magazine, would be in violation of CRS 18-12-302 if the magazine exceeds the legal capacity limit and was not owned prior to the law’s enactment. This distinction is crucial and often leads to confusion among gun owners and enthusiasts.
The legality hinges on the purpose and use of the magazine parts kits: they are legal for repairing existing magazines, but assembling and using new high-capacity magazines from these kits would contravene Colorado law. As always, it’s advisable for individuals to seek legal counsel for clarification and guidance on specific circumstances related to firearm laws.
New Residents Moving Into Colorado From Other States
The legal framework of Colorado’s CRS 18-12-302, which restricts high-capacity magazine possession, does not explicitly address the scenario of individuals moving into Colorado and bringing high-capacity magazines with them. This creates a notable gap in the law, as it clearly outlines the rules for in-state sale, transfer, and possession, but remains silent on the implications for new residents who bring such magazines from states with more lenient laws. This lack of clarity can lead to uncertainty for those relocating to Colorado who own high-capacity magazines.
Impact and Implications
CRS 18-12-302 represents a significant step in Colorado’s gun control efforts. By restricting the availability of large-capacity magazines, the state aims to mitigate the potential for high-casualty shooting incidents. This approach aligns with broader public safety concerns and reflects a legislative response to gun violence.
However, this statute also raises questions about its effectiveness, enforceability, and impact on lawful gun owners. The grandfather clause and specific exemptions create a nuanced landscape where compliance and enforcement can be challenging. Moreover, the debate around magazine capacity limits touches on broader issues of Second Amendment rights and gun control efficacy.
RMGO’s Fight Against Unconstitutional Laws
It’s noteworthy to mention the efforts of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners (RMGO) in challenging this legislation. RMGO, a staunch defender of Second Amendment rights, argues that CRS 18-12-302 infringes upon constitutional freedoms. Their lawsuit contends that the law unjustly restricts the rights of law-abiding citizens and fails to meet the objectives of enhancing public safety. By joining RMGO’s cause, individuals can actively participate in a critical movement to uphold constitutional rights. Their involvement in this legal battle highlights the ongoing national conversation about the balance between gun control measures and the preservation of Second Amendment freedoms. As this issue unfolds, the outcome of RMGO’s efforts could set a precedent with far-reaching implications for gun laws and rights across the United States.
Conclusion
In summary, CRS 18-12-302 is a critical piece of legislation in Colorado’s gun control framework, specifically targeting the capacity of firearm magazines. While it aims to enhance public safety, it also navigates the complex interplay of legal rights, public policy, and safety concerns. As with any law of this nature, its true efficacy and impact continue to be subjects of public and legal discourse.
Legal Disclaimer: The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. The contents of this document should not be construed as legal counsel or a legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The information presented may not reflect the most current legal developments and is subject to change without notice. No reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this document without seeking the appropriate legal or professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a licensed attorney. The author of this document expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this document.
Concealed Carry Classes Of Denver 